- 8,000 lives were lost, a large swathe of the Royal Navy was wiped out and the Eddystone lighthouse off Plymouth was obliterated
- Bishop was found ‘with his brains dash’d out’ after trying to flee from bed
- Torn from its moorings in Cornwall, one ship with its crew still inside ended up on Isle of Wight’s coast – 200 miles away
By
Tony Rennell
Last updated at 2:18 PM on 6th January 2012
Not even the godfearing could escape the wrath of the storm.
The Bishop of Bath and Wells was tucked up in his four-poster bed when the wind blew in the roof of his episcopal palace. He tried to flee but it was too late.
The chimney stacks came crashing down, plunging bishop and wife through the floor, burying both in the rubble.
He was found, it was reported, ‘with his brains dash’d out’ while she had wrapped herself in the sheets out of sheer terror and suffocated. They were the most eminent victims of the most catastrophic and destructive storm ever recorded as hitting the shores of Britain.
The Great Storm of 1703 caused devastation in just one 24 hour spell
Gale force winds whip up the sea around Seaham Habour lighthouse, in County Durham yesterday. Storms and heavy downpours wreaked fresh havoc across Britain causing damage, delays and injuries
The country has trembled this week, rocked by 100mph-plus winds which caused injuries and two reported deaths, but these were relatively endurable conditions compared with the tiger of all tempests, the Great Storm of 1703.
The author Daniel Defoe put the death toll of the storm at around 8,000
It is often overlooked. Historians acknowledge the bad weather that almost stopped William the Conqueror in 1066 and the ‘protestant wind’ saw off the Spanish Armada in 1588. The epic snow-bound winter of 1947 and the forest- felling ‘hurricane’ of 1987 have both passed into legend.
But the daddy of all these disasters — the one against which this week’s heavy winds can justifiably be measured — was three centuries ago, in the reign of Queen Anne.
As an area of low-pressure tracked its way across the centre of the country on the Friday night and Saturday morning of November 26/27, 8,000 lives were lost, a large swathe of the Royal Navy was wiped out and the Eddystone lighthouse off Plymouth was obliterated.
‘Never was such a storm of wind, such a hurricane and tempest known in the memory of man,’ wrote a chronicler of the times, ‘nor the like to be found in the histories of England.’
Gusts in the English Channel topped 140mph. So fierce was the wind that a ship torn from its moorings in the Helford River in Cornwall was blown helplessly, its cowering crew still on board as mountainous seas tossed it, for 200 miles before grounding on the Isle of Wight eight hours later.
Its mast smashed, a ship lies wrecked on the coast. The Royal Navy lost 14 warships and 1,500 crew in the storm
The low pressure system causing all this was astonishing. Daniel Defoe, writer and political commentator (and later the renowned author of Robinson Crusoe) could not believe how low the mercury in his barometer had sunk, and suspected at first that his children had been messing about with the instrument.
What was actually taking place was what historian Martin Brayne terms ‘the most terrifying and catastrophic storm this island has ever known’. The hurricane-force winds caused havoc on land.
Trees were uprooted and reduced to mere matchwood. Hundreds of the windmills that dotted the landscape were destroyed and at least one burst into flames from the friction as the sails whizzed round at extraordinary speed — an uncanny precursor of the modern- day wind turbine that caught fire at Ardrossan in Scotland during high winds last month.
Church spires — which a combination of religious piety and architectural technology had been making ever higher — toppled.
A curate in Kent was distraught to see his landmark spire, close to 200ft and the tallest in the county, dashed to the ground.
Lead was stripped from roofs, simply rolled up like scrolls by the unstoppable force of the wind. Tons of it were torn from the roof of Queen’s College, Oxford, and then sent hurtling through the window of the church opposite.
Gusts in the English Channel topped an incredible 140mph
At Cambridge, pinnacles were blown from the top of King’s College Chapel. Gloucester, Ely and Bristol cathedrals took batterings, and the godly were convinced that the biblical proportions of what was happening meant Judgment Day was upon them.
Homes were just as vulnerable,with falling chimneys a widespread hazard. A moralising chronicler recounted the tragic tale of a child asleep in a cradle a foot from its parents’ bed.
‘The fall of a chimney beat out the infant’s brains and mashed the whole body, in the father’s and mother’s sight.
‘From whence we may observe that, in a general calamity innocency suffers with the guilty, and the poor babe is destroyed with a stroke of divine vengeance while the sinful parents are permitted to stretch out their lives.’
There was a near miss for the Royal Family. At St James’s Palace, Queen Anne and her husband, Prince George, fled from their rooms just minutes before a chimney stack crashed in. As she then stood at a window and watched the trees in the park being torn apart, a garden wall fell.
‘Many houses demolished, many people killed,’ noted the London-based diarist John Evelyn.
Then, when he managed to get to his country house in Kent, he was depressed by the sight of thousands of ‘goodly oaks lying in ghastly postures, like regiments fallen in battle’.
It was the British Isles coastline which saw the worst of the storm, with 1,200 people dying on the Goodwin sand bank in the English Channel
He took it all as divine retribution ‘for our national sins, and my own’.
Around the British coast, there were serious problems with flooding as high tides, whipped up by the wind, surged over inadequate sea defences. Both sides of the Severn estuary were awash.
But it was at sea — the essential highway of an expanding maritime nation — that the havoc was greatest. Dozens of the hundreds of colliers plying the east coast with Tyneside coal for London simply disappeared after trying to ride out the storm at anchor.
Cables snapped in the heaving seas and they were gone.
Further south, the Solent was dotted with wrecks. On one of these, the Newcastle, a 50-gun naval man-of-war, 197 of the 233 crew drowned. Those ships that survived did so because their crews not only hauled down all sails but took axes and hacked down the masts and rigging to deck level to give themselves any chance of staying upright.
One captain of a warship that was escorting 130 merchant ships towards Ireland ordered his fleet to take refuge in Milford Haven, West Wales, when the storm was at its height.
He recorded ‘the dismal sight of ships, some without masts, some sunk and others upon the rocks. The wind was blowing so hard, with thunder, lightning and rain, that a man could not stand on deck. Nigh on 30 merchant ships are lost.’
There were tales of enormous courage and luck, such as the sailor who was washed off one sinking ship by a mighty wave and deposited on the quarterdeck of another, which managed to stay afloat. BUT there were also examples of gross inhumanity.
This image shows a flash of lightning striking what appears to be a lighthouse. Many believed the storm was divine retribution
In the English Channel, numerous ships were blown onto the treacherous Goodwin Sands, a sandbank in the English Channel, and stayed there until the tide washed over them and drowned their crews as they hung upon the broken masts and rigging.
The Kent mainland was just six miles away but folk there did little to help save lives.
Instead, these ‘cannibals’ and ‘monsters’, as an angry Defoe termed them, waited until the sea had claimed the marooned men before moving in to scavenge what they could from the wrecks and the bodies.
‘Boats came very near the stranded men in quest of booty and plunder, but nobody concerned themselves for the lives of these miserable creatures,’
Defoe wrote in The Storm, a chronicle of the ‘dreadful tempest’ which he published the following year. Close to 1,200 lives were lost on the treacherous Goodwin sand bank.
The most spectacular casualty of the storm was one of the recent wonders of the age — the newlybuilt Eddystone lighthouse, a warning beacon on a dangerous reef in the middle of the sea 14 miles south of Plymouth.
It had been completed just five years earlier as the result of the mad-inventor determination and engineering skill of one Henry Winstanley.
It had taken two years to build, its stone base secured to the wave-tossed and frequently unreachable rock by a dozen 12-ft iron rods. Winstanley was convinced it could stand up to anything that Nature could throw at it.
So confident, in fact, that, as the storm began to brew on the morning of November 26, he hitched what turned out to be a suicidal ride on a supply ship to go there and experience for himself how his brainchild would defy the elements.
It didn’t. Winstanley died inside his own creation as, battered by 60ft waves and whipped by incredible winds, the wooden superstructure cracked and it crumbled into the sea.
As for the storm, it blew away as quickly as it had come, roaring across to the European mainland before petering out.
Back in Britain, the country was left to count the cost.
The Navy had lost 14 of its principal fighting ships and 1,500 crew. Defoe put the total loss of life at around 8,000.
But if true, it was a huge slice out of a small nation. Britain’s population was just five million.
It was as if, today, 100,000 people had in a single day and night been slaughtered.
And the cause of all this mayhem?
At the time, the almost universally accepted explanation was that this was the hand of God at work, handing out divine retribution.
‘I pray that we may all repent’, wrote one sea captain, who had survived the onslaught, ‘for doubtless this was a warning against us of God’s anger.’
From a 21st-century viewpoint, the tempest of 1703 has a different explanation — as the sort of exceptional climatic event that occurs perhaps once every 500 years.
At the very least, it puts this week’s stormy weather in perspective.
It could, indeed, have been a lot worse.
Share this article:
Here’s what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have not been moderated.
-
Newest
-
Oldest
-
Best rated
-
Worst rated
Sounds like an Ad-Hominem attack to me. Sounds like you are jealous of Chris from Lincoln massive demonstrative brain skills. You also used the old fabled attack of failed logic despite not having any logical point yourself.
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 06/1/2012 20:00
=========== Ah yes, here’s ‘Dr’ Teddy with his PHD (sic). The fact that you can’t spot the logic flaws in the posts I responded to speaks volumes. I’ll file you in the same drawer as Chris – ‘People Making Claims to be Something They’re Not in Order to Bolster Their Own Egos’. I think I can squeeze you in, though the drawer is pretty full. ‘PHD’ my *rse.
- Nigel, Newport, 07/1/2012 09:40
Report abuse
I do not understand why we continue to have or even allow the Global Warming/Climate Change brigade on these comments. When will they all realise it is all just a con to raise taxes.——————————————-They have their minions at work, no doubt they employ these people to spread the word and infiltrate the forums and blogs and boards to support their cause. As JFK said “It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”
- George B Derby, Derbyshire, 06/1/2012 22:23
Report abuse
Also, love the way that you make some vague accusation about name calling, and then refer to me as Mr. Spock in the next sentence. Genius!
- ZedsDeadBed, Truro, UK, 6/1/2012 21:58 — I’m sorry (and that is not an apology to you but to others) I had to lower myself but that’s the only debate you can understand, you refuse to accept what is plain in front of your face
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 06/1/2012 22:01
Report abuse
“It is a free board not a private conversation. Anyone can ‘butt in’. I see you employ the same tactics as you alias Nigel (name calling etc), Nigel may well you as you both converse from the same phrase book. Logic is not the only tool in the chest you know Mr Spock, not that I’ve seen any logic from either of you.”
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 6/1/2012 21:47
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Anyone can indeed butt in, and you did. However, because you were too lazy and/or dense to follow the conversation back to its start, you didn’t understand what you were butting into, and got it wrong. Your accusation of Nigel being my alias is a false one, I post under this name alone. Also, love the way that you make some vague accusation about name calling, and then refer to me as Mr. Spock in the next sentence. Genius!
- ZedsDeadBed, Truro, UK, 06/1/2012 21:58
Report abuse
I do suspect that the ZedDeadBeds and his ilk all work for some vested interest in the Climate change industry.
- Powerp, Llymm, 6/1/2012 19:43 ************************************ I highly suspect that to be true. I’ve seen him over many years sing from the same hymn book as Global warming/Climate change scientists with vested interests in green technology and energy and high energy taxation despite the overwhelming lies/bad stats, twisted stats, altered stats, exaggerations, emails, bad science against his and his kind that this is a natural phenomena.
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 06/1/2012 21:58
Report abuse
Dear oh dear Teddy. This is what happens when you decide to butt into a conversation, but were too lazy and/or thick to follow it back to its origin. I stated that the comments here made DM readers look like they have low IQs, to which Chris (of Lichfield) claimed that he was a member of Mensa, which proved me wrong. In this light, the existence (or not) of his Mensa membership is entirely pertinent, as is the utter logic failure of his posts. In particular, because having little or no understanding of basic logic, suggests Chris is not, as he claims, in Mensa.
- ZedsDeadBed, Truro, UK, 06/1/2012 20:54 — It is a free board not a private conversation. Anyone can ‘butt in’. I see you employ the same tactics as you alias Nigel (name calling etc), Nigel may well you as you both converse from the same phrase book. Logic is not the only tool in the chest you know Mr Spock, not that I’ve seen any logic from either of you.
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 06/1/2012 21:47
Report abuse
“Sounds like an Ad-Hominem attack to me. Sounds like you are jealous of Chris from Lincoln massive demonstrative brain skills. You also used the old fabled attack of failed logic despite not having any logical point yourself.”
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 6/1/2012 20:00
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear oh dear Teddy. This is what happens when you decide to butt into a conversation, but were too lazy and/or thick to follow it back to its origin. I stated that the comments here made DM readers look like they have low IQs, to which Chris (of Lichfield) claimed that he was a member of Mensa, which proved me wrong. In this light, the existence (or not) of his Mensa membership is entirely pertinent, as is the utter logic failure of his posts. In particular, because having little or no understanding of basic logic, suggests Chris is not, as he claims, in Mensa.
- ZedsDeadBed, Truro, UK, 06/1/2012 20:54
Report abuse
Oh dear. Such a failure of logic from a ‘Mensa member’. You have ‘shown’ nothing of the kind. All you have ‘shown’ is that you can type a sentence claiming to be a member of Mensa (such a sad little claim, and very revealing) and post it on these boards. That’s the full extent of your ‘showing’. Nothing more, nothing less. As for taking your word for it: let’s see what else you say shall we? Why not post something that demonstrates your grasp of logic and your understanding of the subject in question? That way we can judge for ourselves how clever you are and avoid the need for you to make (rather sad) claims about having a massive IQ.
- Nigel, Newport, 06/1/2012 18:01 ====== Sounds like an Ad-Hominem attack to me. Sounds like you are jealous of Chris from Lincoln massive demonstrative brain skills. You also used the old fabled attack of failed logic despite not having any logical point yourself.
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 06/1/2012 20:00
Report abuse
I do not understand why we continue to have or even allow the Global Warming/Climate Change brigade on these comments. When will they all realise it is all just a con to raise taxes. I think the most obvious one’s are the taxes on flying. Has it stopped anyone from flying NO and that includes the representatives travelling to Durban recently, I take it they all Cycled there (no I thought not). I do suspect that the ZedDeadBeds and his ilk all work for some vested interest in the Climate change industry. Just to finish on two items last year, namely the Brisbane floods and New York floods, and I repeat it has flooded in Brisbane regularly since it was founded. As for New York the records go back to 1620, just try looking it all up.
- Powerp, Llymm, 06/1/2012 19:43
Report abuse
Every time I see it, I just have to complain about it. So now I am annoyed with myself for correcting you. Sorry.
- helen, glasgow scotland, 6/1/2012 18:53 — Helen, Glasgow, Scotland. I just had to correct you.
- Dr Teddy Robbear, Scotland, 06/1/2012 19:30
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Article source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2082939/UK-weather-This-weeks-gales-compared-storm-drowned-Britain.html?ITO=1490